Skip to main content
Kaino.dev
Discover
Evals
News
Academics
Insights
Kaino.dev

Discover, evaluate, and compare AI tools, models, and agents.

Explore

  • Discover
  • Evaluations
  • News
  • Academics
  • Insights

Community

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 Kaino.dev. All rights reserved.

Version 1.1.0
DBRX · Evaluations · Kaino
DBRX logo
model evaluation

DBRX

Databricks

DBRX is an open general-purpose MoE language model from Databricks/MosaicML for coding, reasoning, and enterprise LLM use cases.

codingdatabricks
55.7KAINO SCORENot recommended
Evaluated Jul 31, 202612 reviews
Website Docs GitHub

Scorecard

PricingMultimodalCostDev expTechnicalSpeedCodingReasoningRiskAdoption
  • Cost effectiveness72
  • Developer experience68
  • Risk & evidence65
  • Technical capability62
  • Adoption signal61
  • Reasoning & knowledge59
  • Coding & agentic52
  • Speed & availability45
  • Multimodal & I/O38
  • Pricing clarity35

Kainotomic evaluation

DBRX was a credible 2024 open MoE release, with Databricks reporting 70.1% HumanEval pass@1 and an official repository supporting local developer use. However, the available independent evidence is dated: Artificial Analysis assigned an Intelligence Index of 3 in March 2024, and Arena-Hard-Auto v0.1 reports 23.9. It is text-oriented in the supplied evidence, with no supported vision, audio, tool-use, or structured-I/O capability claim. Relative to published anchors, DBRX is materially below Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.5, and GPT-5.6 Sol on current capability, reasoning, and agentic coding evidence. It also trails Kimi K2.5 and DeepSeek-V3.2, which have substantially stronger contemporary coding or general-capability profiles. GLM-4.6 is the closest lower-tier comparison, but DBRX's historical HumanEval result supports a modest coding baseline while not establishing modern repository-agent performance. Against Gemma 3, DBRX has stronger historical code evidence but is clearly worse on multimodal coverage and has less current operational evidence. Open availability can reduce model-license acquisition cost, and the historical Artificial Analysis listing showed zero hosted-token price, but neither fact establishes present hosted pricing or total deployment cost. Artificial Analysis reports no current provider speed or latency data. DeepSWE and current LiveCodeBench contain no DBRX entry; SWE-bench evidence was not found. A secondary CloudPrice listing reports LiveCodeBench 0.1 and rank #301, but this conflicts with the official leaderboard's absence and should not be treated as a robust benchmark result.

Strengths

  • Official Databricks repository and documentation provide a usable starting point for self-hosted development.
  • Databricks reported a strong-for-its-era 70.1% HumanEval pass@1 result.
  • Open MoE positioning offers deployment flexibility where organizations can operate the infrastructure.

Caveats

  • The supplied evidence supports a 2024-era text LLM, not a current frontier model.
  • No supplied evidence verifies multimodal input, native tool use, or contemporary coding-agent performance.
  • Current API-provider availability, latency, and pricing are unsubstantiated.