Skip to main content
Kaino.dev
Discover
Evals
News
Academics
Insights
Kaino.dev

Discover, evaluate, and compare AI tools, models, and agents.

Explore

  • Discover
  • Evaluations
  • News
  • Academics
  • Insights

Community

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 Kaino.dev. All rights reserved.

Version 1.1.0
embed-v4.0 · Evaluations · Kaino
embed-v4.0 logo
model evaluation

embed-v4.0

Cohere

Cohere’s multimodal embedding model for text, images, and mixed documents, with 128K context and configurable embedding dimensions for enterprise search/RAG.

modelsource:cohere.comembedding-modelmultimodaltext-embeddingsimage-embeddingsragenterprise-searchcohere
58.5KAINO SCORENot recommended
Evaluated Aug 3, 20269 reviews
Website Docs

Scorecard

PricingMultimodalCostDev expTechnicalSpeedCodingReasoningRiskAdoption
  • Multimodal & I/O84
  • Developer experience82
  • Technical capability78
  • Risk & evidence74
  • Adoption signal62
  • Cost effectiveness55
  • Speed & availability55
  • Pricing clarity45
  • Reasoning & knowledge30
  • Coding & agentic20

Kainotomic evaluation

embed-v4.0 is a specialized embedding API rather than a general-purpose generative or agentic model. Official Cohere material supports text, image, and mixed-document embeddings, a 128K context window, and configurable dimensions. Its multimodal I/O score is therefore stronger than GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-5.6 Sol, whose published anchors have narrower stated multimodal scores, while remaining below Gemini 3.5 Flash’s 92 because no independent comparative retrieval or vision-embedding result was supplied. Technical and developer scores reflect a documented, purpose-built retrieval offering, not demonstrated frontier general intelligence. Coding, agentic work, and reasoning scores are materially below Bria 3.2 and the GPT, Claude, Gemini, and Kimi anchors: DeepSWE and LiveCodeBench list no result, SWE-bench and Terminal-Bench/Aider evidence was not found, and these tasks are outside the model’s embedding role. The same scope limitation makes LMArena/Arena-Hard preference rankings inapplicable. Cohere’s documentation and API positioning support solid developer experience for enterprise RAG, but the supplied material provides no verified latency, availability, throughput, or independent quality comparison. A Cohere pricing page was checked, yet supplied evidence contains no embed-v4.0 rate details, holding down pricing clarity and cost-effectiveness. Evidence quality is moderate: official claims are clear, but public third-party benchmark coverage and direct adoption signals are limited.

Strengths

  • Multimodal embeddings for text, images, and mixed documents.
  • 128K context and configurable dimensions support flexible enterprise retrieval designs.
  • Official Cohere documentation provides a clear API-oriented product definition.

Caveats

  • Not a chat, reasoning, coding, or autonomous-agent model; direct comparisons on those tasks are structurally limited.
  • No supplied independent retrieval-quality benchmark, latency measurement, or throughput result.
  • No embed-v4.0-specific pricing details were present in the supplied evidence.