Skip to main content
Kaino.dev
Discover
Evals
News
Academics
Insights
Kaino.dev

Discover, evaluate, and compare AI tools, models, and agents.

Explore

  • Discover
  • Evaluations
  • News
  • Academics
  • Insights

Community

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 Kaino.dev. All rights reserved.

Version 1.1.0
Phi-4-reasoning-vision-15B · Evaluations · Kaino
Phi-4-reasoning-vision-15B logo
model evaluation

Phi-4-reasoning-vision-15B

Microsoft

Compact 15B open-weight multimodal reasoning model for vision-language tasks, UI grounding, math, science, and document understanding.

modelsource:microsoft.commultimodalvision-languagereasoningopen-weightMicrosoft
70.3KAINO SCORERecommended
Evaluated Jul 31, 20268 reviews
Website Docs GitHub

Scorecard

PricingMultimodalCostDev expTechnicalSpeedCodingReasoningRiskAdoption
  • Cost effectiveness82
  • Developer experience80
  • Multimodal & I/O79
  • Technical capability78
  • Reasoning & knowledge74
  • Risk & evidence73
  • Speed & availability71
  • Adoption signal66
  • Coding & agentic52
  • Pricing clarity48

Kainotomic evaluation

Phi-4-reasoning-vision-15B is a compact open-weight multimodal model with official positioning for vision-language reasoning, UI grounding, documents, math, and science. Its 15B scale, direct-versus-longer reasoning design, and documented vision focus support technical and multimodal scores above GLM-4.6’s 55 multimodal anchor, but below Kimi K2.5 (84) and Gemini 3.5 Flash (92), which have stronger evaluated multimodal ecosystems. The supplied evidence supports capability directionally, not a broad independent performance ranking. Coding and agentic-work evidence is weak: DeepSWE and LiveCodeBench explicitly have no listing, while no usable Terminal-Bench, Aider, or SWE-bench result is supplied. Accordingly it sits materially below GLM-4.6 (79), Grok 3 (82), and frontier coding anchors. Open weights and official Hugging Face/GitHub distribution improve deployability and likely self-hosting economics relative to closed premium models such as Claude Opus 4.8, but Microsoft pricing or serving-cost figures are not supplied. Developer experience is solid for an officially published repository and model page, though API, production-hosting, throughput, adoption, and safety evidence is limited. Speed receives only a moderate compact-model inference rather than a measured claim. Public signal remains below widely deployed proprietary anchors, and evidence quality is constrained by reliance on official materials plus benchmark absences.

Strengths

  • Official Microsoft open-weight 15B multimodal reasoning release
  • Document understanding and UI-grounding orientation
  • Self-hosting potential and accessible GitHub/Hugging Face distribution

Caveats

  • No published DeepSWE or LiveCodeBench entry in supplied evidence
  • No verified SWE-bench, Terminal-Bench, or Aider result supplied
  • No provider pricing, measured latency, or throughput evidence supplied