Skip to main content
Kaino.dev
Discover
Evals
News
Academics
Insights
Kaino.dev

Discover, evaluate, and compare AI tools, models, and agents.

Explore

  • Discover
  • Evaluations
  • News
  • Academics
  • Insights

Community

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 Kaino.dev. All rights reserved.

Version 1.1.0
Qwen/Qwen3-8B · Evaluations · Kaino
Qwen/Qwen3-8B logo
model evaluation

Qwen/Qwen3-8B

Qwen

Qwen3-8B is a Qwen text-generation model in the Qwen3 series, developed by the Qwen team at Alibaba Cloud.

modellead-sourcehugging-face-popular-modelssource:github.comqwenqwen3qwen3-8btext-generationllmmultilingualcodinghugging-face
68.2KAINO SCORENot recommended
Evaluated Aug 3, 202613 reviews
Website Docs GitHub

Scorecard

PricingMultimodalCostDev expTechnicalSpeedCodingReasoningRiskAdoption
  • Cost effectiveness88
  • Developer experience84
  • Speed & availability76
  • Technical capability74
  • Risk & evidence74
  • Adoption signal69
  • Pricing clarity65
  • Reasoning & knowledge62
  • Coding & agentic55
  • Multimodal & I/O35

Kainotomic evaluation

Qwen3-8B is a capable small, text-only open-weight model rather than a frontier general-purpose system. Its reported LiveCodeBench v5 result is 57.5 in thinking mode, but Artificial Analysis places the reasoning variant at Intelligence Index 8; this supports materially lower technical and reasoning scores than DeepSeek-V3.2, Kimi K2.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, and Claude Opus 4.8. No supplied evidence establishes image, audio, video, or structured-tool I/O capability for this specific model, so multimodal/I/O is well below those anchors. Coding evidence is mixed. The Qwen technical report's 57.5 LiveCodeBench result indicates useful code generation, while Amazon's SWE-bench Verified results of 13.2% baseline and 13.0% CodeStruct, plus 2.47% ±0.5 on Terminal-Bench 2.0, show weak autonomous repository and terminal execution relative to GLM-4.6, DeepSeek-V3.2, Kimi K2.5, GPT-5.5, and Opus 4.8. DeepSWE has no listed Qwen3-8B result. It therefore rates above Pegasus 1.5 for software-oriented use, but below the coding-focused comparable anchors. Cost is a principal advantage: Artificial Analysis reports $0.18/M input and $0.70/M output for non-reasoning, with self-hosting also supported. Reported throughput is roughly 38–40 output tokens/s, though TTFT is about 3.7–3.8 seconds. Developer experience is comparatively strong because official examples cover SGLang, vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, llama.cpp, and Ollama. Pricing clarity is limited because supplied official materials do not provide canonical pricing, and public-preference evidence does not supply a verifiable Arena ranking.

Strengths

  • Competitive small-model code generation in thinking mode: 57.5 on the cited LiveCodeBench v5 result.
  • Low reported token pricing and self-hosted deployment options.
  • Broad official deployment coverage across major inference stacks.
  • 119-language and hybrid thinking-mode positioning documented by Qwen.

Caveats

  • SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench results indicate limited end-to-end coding-agent reliability.
  • This catalog item is text-generation only in the supplied evidence; multimodal capability is not established.
  • Artificial Analysis measurements and prices distinguish non-reasoning and reasoning configurations, so they may not map identically to every deployment.
  • No directly verifiable current LiveCodeBench leaderboard or Arena placement was supplied.