Skip to main content
Kaino.dev
Discover
Evals
News
Academics
Insights
Kaino.dev

Discover, evaluate, and compare AI tools, models, and agents.

Explore

  • Discover
  • Evaluations
  • News
  • Academics
  • Insights

Community

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

© 2026 Kaino.dev. All rights reserved.

Version 1.1.0
Gemma 3 · Evaluations · Kaino
G
model evaluation

Gemma 3

Google DeepMind

Open model family from Google DeepMind for text, image understanding, reasoning, multilingual use, and developer deployment.

multimodalgooglegemma
72.3KAINO SCORERecommended
Evaluated Jul 28, 202614 reviews
Website Docs GitHub

Scorecard

PricingMultimodalCostDev expTechnicalSpeedCodingReasoningRiskAdoption
  • Cost effectiveness90
  • Developer experience86
  • Multimodal & I/O84
  • Speed & availability82
  • Technical capability78
  • Risk & evidence78
  • Adoption signal72
  • Reasoning & knowledge67
  • Pricing clarity64
  • Coding & agentic42

Kainotomic evaluation

Gemma 3 is well documented by Google DeepMind as an open-weight family with 1B, 4B, 12B, and 27B variants, 128K context, broad multilingual coverage, text/image input with text output, function calling, quantized releases, and local or cloud deployment paths. This gives it strong technical breadth and developer usability for an open model family, especially where deployment control matters. Coding evidence is mixed and materially below frontier coding agents. Google’s model card and technical report provide LiveCodeBench results, with the strongest cited Gemma 3 IT result reaching 39.0 in one table. Aider lists gemma-3-27b-it at 4.9% on its polyglot benchmark, DeepSWE has no Gemma 3 entry, and supplied SWE-bench evidence does not show a Gemma 3 Verified score. Preference evidence is also moderate: Arena ranks gemma-3-27b-it relatively low overall, while Arena-Hard shows some usable general and creative-writing signal. Cost and availability are strong because the model is open-weight, appears in multiple runtime/provider contexts, and Artificial Analysis lists Google AI Studio pricing at $0.00 for Gemma 3 27B. Pricing clarity is not complete: supplied Google Cloud evidence covers supervised fine-tuning prices, while runtime costs depend on provider or self-hosting. Overall evidence quality is good for capabilities and deployment, but weaker for independent benchmark coverage and exact licensing/pricing details.

Strengths

  • Open-weight Google DeepMind model family with multiple sizes from 1B to 27B.
  • Officially documented 128K context, multilingual support, image understanding, function calling, quantized versions, and local/cloud deployment paths.
  • Strong developer surface through Google AI documentation, Model Garden paths, AI Studio access, and gemma.cpp.
  • High cost-effectiveness for self-hosting and free or low-cost provider availability cited by Artificial Analysis.

Caveats

  • Coding-agent performance is weak versus frontier systems based on Aider and limited LiveCodeBench scores.
  • No supplied evidence shows a Gemma 3 entry on DeepSWE or a SWE-bench Verified score.
  • Pricing is fragmented: official supplied pricing mainly covers supervised fine-tuning, while inference cost depends on provider or hosting setup.
  • Public preference rankings place gemma-3-27b-it well below leading closed and open frontier models.